LEGAL INJUNCTION
QB-2020-002916; 187b Town and Country Planning Act 1990
&
A2/2020/2134
20th August 2020
Bundle for ex parte application for interim injunction hearing
Description:
Documents related to LB Hackney seeking High Court action - an injunction to restrain alleged "unlawful development" at the Hoxton Docks site.
20th August 2020
Description:
Hackney's submission to the Court seeking an injunction against Antepavilion's installations.
20th August 2020
Description:
Further details of Hackney's claim against Antepavilion, citing a Guardian interview in which Russell Gray was misquoted as supporting evidence.
20th August 2020
First witness statement of Patrick O'Connor
Description:
Hackney's Planning Enforcement Team Leader's statement on why the Council sought an emergency injunction, also citing the misquotes published by the Guardian to support its claim.
20th August 2020
Claimant's skeleton argument for interim injunction hearing
Description:
Full details of Hackney's claims to the Court seeking the interim injunction against Antepavilion, preventing the display of art installations over the entire site. A use which has been ongoing for over 20 years and is well known to the Council.
20th August 2020
Description:
Interim injunction Court order approving Hackney's application against Antepavilion's installations, handed down without any notice to Antepavilion.
20th August 2020
Second witness statement of Patrick O'Connor
Description:
Following the judgment of Mr. Justice Johnson earlier the same day, Hackney's Planning Enforcement Team Leader's statement detailing his visit to Hoxton Docks to serve the injunction notice on Antepavilion.
27th August 2020
Third witness statement of Patrick O'Connor
Description:
Statement on behalf of LB Hackney in support of its attempt to gain a permanent injunction against Antepavilion.
28th August 2020
Bundle for interim injunction reconsideration hearing
Description:
Full collection of documents for the reconsideration hearing of LB Hackney's attempts to secure a permanent injunction.
28th August 2020
Claimant's skeleton argument for reconsideration hearing
Description:
The legal argument advanced by LB Hackney for pursuing a permanent injunction against Antepavilion's installations.
28th August 2020
Defendant's skeleton argument cum witness statement for reconsideration hearing
Description:
Full details of the legal challenge put forward by Antepavilion against the injunction and in defence of art installations at the Hoxton Docks site.
28th August 2020
Defendant's skeleton argument cum witness statement for reconsideration hearing - EXHIBIT
Description:
A collection of evidence used by Antepavilion in its defence to LB Hackney's injunction threat including the history of the art installations over a 20 year period, as well as LB Hackney's historic aggressive approach towards Antepavilion and attempts to seize control of the Hoxton Docks site.
28th August 2020
Fourth witness statement of Patrick O'Connor
Description:
Another statement on behalf of LB Hackney, detailing planning application history on the Hoxton Docks site.
Dated 25th August 2020
Served 28th August 2020
Fifth witness statement of Patrick O'Connor
Description:
Yet another statement on behalf of LB Hackney, which is a duplicate of the fourth witness statement, detailing planning application history of the site.
18th September 2020
Approved judgment against Sharks!
Description:
Judgment of Mr. Justice Murray discharging original injunction and granting new injunction against Sharks! alone.
12th October 2020
Claimant’s Post Judgment submissions
Description:
Hackney’s submissions for ‘consequential issues’ hearing held on 14.10.2020
13th October 2020
Witness statement of Russell Gray
Description:
First Defendant witness statement and submissions for ‘consequential issues’ hearing
14th October 2020
Description:
Judgment of Mr. Justice Murray discharging original injunction and granting new injunction against Sharks! alone.
27th November 2020
2nd Witness statement of Russell Gray
Description:
Further evidence submitted by the Defendant for the trial to be held in Jan/Feb 2021.
18th December 2020
Witness statement of Patrick O’Connor and exhibits
Description:
Further evidence submitted by Hackney for the trial to be held in Jan/Feb 2021.
21st May 2021
Respondent’s Submission on question of Permission to Appeal
Description:
Mayor and LB Hackney’s response to Shiva Ltd’s application to appeal for Judicial Review, in which they argue the appeal not be heard.
2nd July 2021
Letter from Court of Appeal granting permission to appeal
Description:
Judgement: first ground for appeal is refused, as no error was found in the Judge’s construction of section 187B. Grounds 2 to 4 are granted, as the grant of an interlocutory mandatory injunction was found to be unusual and the judge did not draw any distinction between the grant of a prohibitory and mandatory injunction.
04th November 2021
Court of Appeal Order Setting Hearing date
Description:
An Order from the Court of Appeal setting the hearing date for either the 2nd or 3rd of February and requiring bundles to be submitted by 22 December 2021.